Pre-announcement sweep: a contact channel, a fresh Titles shot

Three of four reviewer nits. The real gap: the Gitea instance takes no
public registrations, so announcement readers had no way to report
anything — the README now offers the author's email and says plainly
why there's no issue tracker yet. The Titles screenshot still showed
the day-three catalog ("123 extracted titles") — replaced with the
clean run's capture (150 reads, shaky-read badges, the add-a-game
panel) and honest alt text. And the Beta classifier gets a comment
recording that it's deliberate alongside the README's "battle-tested":
tested for one person on one platform is exactly what Beta means.

The fourth item (release notes on the v1.0.0 tag) is a Gitea web-UI
task — notes drafted separately for pasting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jXZFSTZQKzAC8fqpWSz9g

docs/tour.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ Seven pages in one local app — Pipeline, Photos, Titles, Review, Queue, Librar
 
 ![Photos page: drag-and-drop upload zone, reshoot tickets with photo thumbnails and shelf-location descriptions, and the gallery of all shelf photos with per-photo title counts](screenshots/02.png)
 
-**Titles** — every read off the shelves, alphabetized with status and source photos. This is the proofreading checkpoint: edit misreads, split multi-copy lines, remove non-games.
+**Titles** — every read off the shelves, alphabetized with status and source photos. This is the proofreading checkpoint: edit misreads, split multi-copy lines, remove non-games, add a game no photo caught.
 
-![Titles page: 123 extracted titles with AUTO / AWAITING BGG status chips, source photo links, edit and split-into-copies actions, and a shaky-reads filter](screenshots/03.png)
+![Titles page: 150 title reads with status chips and source photo links, shaky-read badges with one-click confirm, split-into-copies and edit actions, and the add-a-game panel open](screenshots/16-titles-proofread.png)
 
 **Review** — keyboard-first decisions on ambiguous matches. Each card shows the shelf photo beside the candidates (with rank, owner counts, and a view-on-BGG link per candidate), plus hand-steered re-searches of BGG or RPGGeek when the automatic search can't reach the right database. Here: is that box base Agricola or the Revised Edition?